<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ticket search results</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/</link><description>You searched for labels:"for-support"</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:36:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Pre-fill "private" using URL param</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/6353/</link><description>Something like https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/new/?private=true to pre-check the "private" checkbox would be especially nice on pages that ask for tickets for items like security vulnerabilities or anything else that might involve private data.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:36:21 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/6353/</guid></item><item><title>Only allow web based svn import if repo is empty</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/6344/</link><description>Had an incident this past week where a project accidentally wiped out their repository by trying to import while on the page for the wrong repo (and apparently provided incorrect data in the form as well).

I think a good option to prevent this in the future would be to only allow repo imports over empty repos (might also prevent issues with trying to import onto a repo that's been borked via direct edits). Requiring the explicit extra step of deleting and recreating the repo should prevent unintentional overwriting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/6344/</guid></item><item><title>Remove SF specific fields from metadata page</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/6154/</link><description>On /p/foo/admin/overview there are a lot of fields that are only useful in conjunction with sfpy. We should hide/remove those for non-SF Allura deployments.

As far as I can tell, the following fields require sfpy:

* Homepage
* Full Description
* Twitter
* Facebook
* Support page
* Certain Project Statuses (deleted will make project publicly inaccessible, but if it's "moved" or "abandoned" we don't show that anywhere)

Alternatively, we could figure out a way to display these somewhere without sfpy.

We may want to remove/hide some, and add display capabilities for others.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:34:03 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/6154/</guid></item><item><title>Deleted tickets shouldn't be counted in search bins</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/5897/</link><description>Ticket counts in search bins includes deleted tickets, but I don't really think that they should.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:49:03 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/5897/</guid></item><item><title>site/neighborhood admin user subscription check</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/5185/</link><description>From a support perspective, it would be really, really great to be able to view a user's subscriptions, and ideally, also be able to unsubscribe when appropriate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:09:43 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/5185/</guid></item><item><title>Default columns/views setting for tracker</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/5114/</link><description>I would love to be able to configure the default search used for a tickets landing page, and also the default columns shown on all ticket listings.

In particular, for site-support, it doesn't really fit, so I don't use the "milestone" function at all, so it's just wasting screen real-estate, similarly, the assignee doesn't really matter, and I'd also love to show the "mod_time" in the default view.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/5114/</guid></item><item><title>site/neighborhood admins should be able to orphan projects</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4750/</link><description>For support, we occasionally get requests to orphan projects, so site/neighborhood admins should be able to override the "no removing the last admin" control.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:15 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4750/</guid></item><item><title>"Related" artifacts should indicate project/tool if referencing other project</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4703/</link><description>As I link more support tickets to allura tickets, the "Related" section starts to get a bit confusing as there's no way (aside from checking the link URLS) to see which tickets are for the same ticketing system, and which go to a different project.

Eg., I'm mentioning [forge:site-support:#1] and now the Related section will just say "Ticket: #1", and it's not obvious that it's not for this ticket tracker.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4703/</guid></item><item><title>Revisions to /nf/admin/new_projects</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4595/</link><description>* filter out deleted projects altogether; remove the column
* checkbox is a tiny click target.  Make clicking anywhere on the row check the checkbox.  Except the links within the row.
* In the Admins column, only show their username &amp; link to /u/username (not all the User info like current)
* CSS formatting in sftheme to make cells narrower so it all fits.
* add ability to filter by date/date ranges (doesn't have to have a pretty UI, just simple textboxes ok).  See how /nf/admin/task_manager does date range filtering via ObjectId.
* remove the count() query since that is very slow with the `$ne` clause (that can't use an index).  If the pagination doesn't work without knowing the total, change it to be a "next" button, which just passes a param that feeds into the date range filtering.
</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Brondsema</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:20 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4595/</guid></item><item><title>Autofill custom ticket fields by url param</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4526/</link><description>Follow-up to [#4333].

Autofilling works for description, summary and labels, but not custom fields or other default fields. eg. https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/new/?_size=2&amp;summary=foosdfds&amp;description=bar&amp;labels=bar,bling</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:31:38 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4526/</guid></item><item><title>"self" variable for ticket searches</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4504/</link><description>I'd like to be able to set up a saved search that could return all the tickets reported by the user performing the search. Similar to how Trac uses `$USER` for that purpose (eg. &lt;https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/report/9&gt;).

Or some other way for users to (relatively) easily find the tickets they submitted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4504/</guid></item><item><title>Developer-only fields for tickets</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4503/</link><description>It's often not desirable to allow users to change whatever fields they want (eg., re-opening closed tickets, or changing milestones), it would be nice to be able to mark fields in the field management as only developer-editable.

It may also be useful to be able to set fields as only viewable by developers (eg. for internal tracking that may not be useful for regular users).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:40:29 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4503/</guid></item><item><title>Subscribe another user to an artifact (global admin only)</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4449/</link><description>At /nf/admin (only accessible by global admins) create a new left-menu item called 'Add Subscribers' which goes to a new page.  On this page, there should be a form to enter a URL and a username.  Take the URL and run it through URL dispatch to determine what artifact it goes with (e.g. ticket, wiki page).  Note: if the URL dispatch is hard to do at all, we can use a different approach, like separate input boxes for neighborhood, project, tool mount point, ticket number.

Then add the specified username as a subscriber to the artifact, if they aren't already.  This should work just like when you subscribe yourself to a ticket, but for a different user.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Brondsema</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4449/</guid></item><item><title>Move tickets between ticket tools/projects</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4339/</link><description>It would be useful to be able to move tickets between different ticket instances. Specific use cases for support would be:

1) moving confirmed bug reports to engr for further eval/processing. So we can maintain separate ticket queues without needing to manage duplicate tickets.

2) moving tickets that should have been logged to a project instead.

I think both these cases could be covered by only allowing users with admin(?) permissions on both tickets instances to move tickets between them.

*We should also consider auto-forwarding from the old ticket URL and not re-using the ticket number after a ticket has been moved.*  Let's not do this yet.  But we do need to figure out how to clean up old references to the old artifact path (e.g. solr and artifact references) 

*Another concern is how to handle custom fields/statuses that aren't shared by both tickets instances.*  We should just drop those fields/values if they can't be converted.  But we should put a comment on the ticket about the conversion and include the full URL of the prior ticket and also insert all the fields/values that couldn't be converted.

The ticket artifact should stay the same, so that subscriptions and other stuff are preserved.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:56 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4339/</guid></item><item><title>Autofill ticket fields by url param</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4333/</link><description>There should be a way to pre-fill ticket fields, possibly using arguments in the URL like Trac does. We currently do this for reporting 404 and 500 errors to support Trac.

Eg. &lt;https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/newticket?summary=Page+Missing+%28404%29%3A+https%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/not-a-project/&amp;description=I+found+this+link+here...&gt;

</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4333/</guid></item><item><title>Add users to private tickets</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4320/</link><description>After [#3892] is done, there should be a UI to add another user to have permission to read a private ticket.  Someone with 'edit' permission on a ticket should be able to add the additional users.

I believe private tickets are implement with an artifact-level ACL, not merely a boolean flag, so the backend support should be correct.  However, we should double check that the ACL is used in all relevant permission checks, so it works fully.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Brondsema</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:21 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/4320/</guid></item><item><title>Ticket create and edit should be separate permissions NEEDS MIGRATION</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/3892/</link><description>Currently, the `WRITE` permission controls both new ticket creation and editing existing tickets. These should be separated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Tsai</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:57 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/3892/</guid></item><item><title>Better standard tool search results</title><link>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/2835/</link><description>Specifically the wiki search results should look better, but let's see how much improvement we can get through the generic search result template.  E.g. https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/wiki/search/?q=faq  A few suggestions

* an option to only include primary artifacts (no comments)
* artifact type (WikiPage) doesn't need to be shown in that case - best to stop including that in the title field when indexing?
* exclude deleted pages
* better relevance - e.g. a title match should be better than a body text match.  I also think we are matching across too many fields in the first place.  E.g. a search for "forgewiki" or "WikiPage" or the mount point shouldn't match the "internal" fields in the solr document.
* show a preview of the content
* change `&lt;hr&gt;` for something better
* add some metadata on the title line, like last modified date
* if you choose to search history, the results links need "?version=N"
* change sort order (relevance, date, etc) and direction
* add search syntax help and examples (like we do for tickets)

Here's a mockup of how https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/wiki/search/?q=faq could look: http://screencast.com/t/06dC4NjT60</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Brondsema</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:07:54 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/tickets/2835/</guid></item></channel></rss>