#4495 svn import page should provide more info

v1.0.0
closed
nobody
42cc (432)
General
Dave Brondsema
2015-08-20
2012-07-03
Chris Tsai
No

1) it currently just says "If you really, really want to do this, enter the URL of the source repository below:", except it doesn't indicate why that might not be a good idea (ie., that it's going to overwrite current contents)

2) it should indicate what sort of URL format it's expecting: an http or https URL to a SVN repository that is publicly accessible (no password)

3) the text box is tiny.

4) it should say that an email notification will be sent when complete.

Related

Tickets: #4495

Discussion

  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-07-09
    • labels: support --> support, 42cc
    • Description has changed:

    Diff:

    --- old
+++ new
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
 1) it currently just says "If you really, **really** want to do this, enter the URL of the source repository below:", except it doesn't indicate why that might not be a good idea (ie., that it's going to overwrite current contents)

-2) it should indicate what sort of URL format it's expecting
+2) it should indicate what sort of URL format it's expecting: an http or https URL to a SVN repository that is publicly accessible (no password)
+
+3) the text box is tiny.
+
+4) it should say that an email notification will be sent when complete.
    • milestone: limbo --> forge-backlog
     

  • Yaroslav Luzin - 2012-07-10

    created #109: [#4495] svn import page should provide more info (1cp)

     

    Related

    Tickets: #4495

  • Yaroslav Luzin - 2012-07-10
    • status: open --> in-progress
     

  • Yaroslav Luzin - 2012-07-11

    closed #109, please check 42cc_4495 branch

    • status: in-progress --> code-review
     

  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-07-16
    • labels: --> 42cc
     

  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-07-16

    The changes to requirements-sf.txt and requirements-common.txt were not related to this ticket and not explained in the commit - we need good rationale for changes to the requirements files. I reverted them and did not merge them. Maybe it was because of the sqlalchemy usage in script.py? I have fixed that on dev in a different way just a day or two ago.

    Merged the rest of the changes.

     

  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-07-16
    • status: code-review --> closed
    • qa: Dave Brondsema
    • milestone: forge-backlog --> forge-jul-27
     

Log in to post a comment.