[forge:site-support:#954]
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/alleg/allegro/
They don't have the standard "master", perhaps we need a config option to set a default branch in the absence of a "master" branch?
The web interface thinks the project is empty. Maybe you can add a way to detect or set the default branch, like on github?
Report of similar case for hg: [forge:site-support:#1704]
https://sourceforge.net/p/anuchem/code/
[forge:site-support:#2850]
More hg examples here: https://sourceforge.net/p/evilnet/_list/hg (as of writing, all but "nefarious2")
Let's add an admin option to specify a default branch, for git & hg. If set, use that instead of hard-coded "master" whenever appropriate.
Created #374: [#5103] admin option to specify default branch for git and hg (2cp)
Related
Tickets:
#5103Closed #374.
Allura:
je/42cc_5103
ForgeHg:
42cc_5103
The code for setting the branch name works fine. But the repo tree view still appears empty. Here are the steps to replicate, see if this works for you:
touch file1 && git add . && git commit -m "1"
git checkout -b mybranch && touch file2 && git add . && git commit -m "2"
git push origin mybranch
Created #396: [#5103] Repo is empty on default branch (2cp)
I was able to reproduce this too. We'll investigate in the #396.
Related
Tickets:
#5103Closed #396.
Allura:
je/42cc_5103
(forced update)ForgeHg:
42cc_5103
Both branches merged to master. Once the new ForgeHg build hits python tree (https://trac.sdot.me/trac/siteops/ticket/54029), need to bump version on Allura.
ForgeHg version will be bumped by [#3060].
Related
Tickets:
#3060