Ming 0.3 has some backwards-incompatible changes with package names. [#3822] took care of this for sfpy; we only need to update allura. Zarkov too might be nice.
--- old +++ new @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@-Ming 0.3 has some backwards-incompatible changes with package names. +Ming 0.3 has some backwards-incompatible changes with package names. [#3822] took care of this for sfpy; we only need to update allura. Zarkov too might be nice.
We need to make sure forge-classic code gets updated too
--
Dave Brondsema
Lead Software Engineer - sf.net
Geeknet
====
This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
It may be best for us to do the changes ourselves - not sure how soon Rick
will get access to forge-classic
====
This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Diff:
Related
Tickets:
#3822Code is on rc/3861 and is compatible AFAICT with Ming master at 593f8b7cf73549cd9a0e3d3d8e68333ba6f60574
We need to make sure forge-classic code gets updated too
--
Dave Brondsema
Lead Software Engineer - sf.net
Geeknet
====
This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
Allura changes look fine, but waiting on forge classic changes Dave mentioned.
It may be best for us to do the changes ourselves - not sure how soon Rick
will get access to forge-classic
====
This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
My testing looks good with allura on rc/3861 and forge-classic on dev.