#3861 Upgrade to ming 0.3 (orm->odm rename)

v1.0.0
closed
sf-1 (616)
General
nobody
2015-08-20
2012-03-07
No

Ming 0.3 has some backwards-incompatible changes with package names. [#3822] took care of this for sfpy; we only need to update allura. Zarkov too might be nice.

Related

Tickets: #3822

Discussion

  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-03-12
    • Description has changed:

    Diff:

    --- old 
    +++ new 
    @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
    -Ming 0.3 has some backwards-incompatible changes with package names.  
    +Ming 0.3 has some backwards-incompatible changes with package names.  [#3822] took care of this for sfpy; we only need to update allura.  Zarkov too might be nice.
    
     

    Related

    Tickets: #3822

  • Rick Copeland - 2012-03-13
    • status: open --> in-progress
    • assigned_to: Rick Copeland ☕
     
  • Rick Copeland - 2012-03-13

    Code is on rc/3861 and is compatible AFAICT with Ming master at 593f8b7cf73549cd9a0e3d3d8e68333ba6f60574

     
  • Rick Copeland - 2012-03-13
    • status: in-progress --> code-review
    • qa: Dave Brondsema
    • size: --> 1
     
  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-03-14
    • qa: Dave Brondsema --> Jenny Steele
     
  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-03-16

    We need to make sure forge-classic code gets updated too

    --
    Dave Brondsema
    Lead Software Engineer - sf.net
    Geeknet

    ====
    This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.

     
  • Jenny Steele

    Jenny Steele - 2012-03-16
    • status: code-review --> open
     
  • Jenny Steele

    Jenny Steele - 2012-03-16

    Allura changes look fine, but waiting on forge classic changes Dave mentioned.

     
  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2012-03-16

    It may be best for us to do the changes ourselves - not sure how soon Rick
    will get access to forge-classic

    ====
    This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.

     
  • Rick Copeland - 2012-03-22

    My testing looks good with allura on rc/3861 and forge-classic on dev.

     
  • Rick Copeland - 2012-03-22
    • status: open --> code-review
     
  • Jenny Steele

    Jenny Steele - 2012-03-22
    • status: code-review --> closed
     

Log in to post a comment.