#5529 ActivityStream should state it's copyright

v1.0.0
closed
General
nobody
2015-08-20
2012-12-27
No

As of now, ActivityStream lacks any sort of copyright and licensing information, both on PyPI or in the codebase itself.

It's probably a minor issue since the code, I believe, has been developed in-house. But from Allura perspective it's still and external dependency and hence it's copyright status should be as clear as possible.

Related

Tickets: #4647

Discussion

  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2013-01-02
    • milestone: limbo --> forge-jan-11
     
  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2013-01-02

    Activity stream was developed by SourceForge/geeknet. We should license it under the Apache License 2.0

     
  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2013-01-03
    • size: --> 1
     
  • Tim Van Steenburgh

    • status: open --> in-progress
    • assigned_to: Tim Van Steenburgh
     
  • Tim Van Steenburgh

    • status: in-progress --> closed
     
  • Dave Brondsema

    Dave Brondsema - 2013-11-01
    • labels: activitystream, asf --> asf, activitystreams
     

Log in to post a comment.